Close, But No Cigar: An Exploration of the Phrase’s Origin and Roots

Before the phrase ever became something people casually toss into conversation, it was grounded in something very real, very tactile, and very smoky: the cigar itself. To understand the origin of “close, but no cigar,” you have to step away from abstract language analysis and walk directly into the world where cigars were not just smoked, but earned. This isn’t a story about clever wording or linguistic shortcuts. It’s a story about objects, rewards, and the human reaction to just barely missing out.

Here, we'll focus entirely on that world—the cigar-centric culture that allowed a phrase like this to be born. We’ll explore how cigars became prizes, why they were so emotionally charged, and how repeatedly almost winning one created a shared experience powerful enough to echo through generations. By the end, it should be clear that without cigars, this phrase wouldn’t exist at all.

The Rise of Cigars in Western Popular Culture

Cigars didn’t start as symbols of luxury or reward. Their journey began centuries earlier with indigenous peoples of the Caribbean and the Americas, who used rolled tobacco leaves in ritualistic and social contexts. When European explorers encountered tobacco, they didn’t just bring back a plant, they imported an entire sensory experience. Over time, that experience was refined, commodified, and elevated.

By the 18th and 19th centuries, cigars had taken on a new identity in Western society. They became associated with wealth, relaxation, and power. Unlike pipes, which required preparation, or cigarettes, which burned quickly, cigars demanded time. Lighting one was a commitment. Smoking one was an event. That alone made cigars feel special.

As cigar production expanded, especially in places like Cuba, cigars became more accessible, but not commonplace. Even the more affordable varieties still felt like treats. This balance between availability and exclusivity made cigars perfect symbols of achievement. They were within reach, but not guaranteed. You didn’t smoke a cigar because you had to. You smoked one because you earned it—or because someone wanted you to feel like you had.

That cultural positioning laid the foundation for cigars to become rewards in public settings, particularly in places built around entertainment and competition.

Cigars in 19th-Century America

In 19th-century America, cigars were everywhere but not evenly distributed. Tobacco factories flourished, especially in urban centers, employing thousands of workers, many of them immigrants. Hand-rolled cigars were still common, and craftsmanship mattered. A well-made cigar wasn’t just a product; it was a reflection of skill.

For working-class men, cigars represented a step above the daily grind. After long hours in factories, on docks, or in fields, a cigar offered a brief escape. It was a small luxury that didn’t require wealth, just opportunity. That made cigars ideal for public reward systems. They were desirable without being impractical.

Cigars also fit neatly into social spaces of the time. Saloons, clubs, and lodges all embraced cigar smoking as part of their atmosphere. Lighting up wasn’t just personal; it was social. Winning a cigar meant you didn’t just get to smoke; you got to smoke in front of others. That public validation mattered.

This environment made cigars more than consumables. They became markers of momentary success, especially in competitive or skill-based settings.

Cigars as Prizes and Rewards

The idea of using cigars as prizes didn’t happen by accident. A good prize needs to hit a sweet spot: it has to be desirable, affordable for the giver, and immediately gratifying for the recipient. Cigars checked every box.

Unlike cash, cigars felt personal. Unlike food, they weren’t necessities. And unlike trinkets, they had a clear cultural meaning. Receiving a cigar was an acknowledgment of effort or skill. It said, you were good enough to deserve this.

Cigars were also consumable, which made them perfect for repeated use as prizes. Once smoked, they were gone—no long-term cost, no clutter.  These giveaway cigars bore little resemblance to the better cigars appreciated today, where blend, origin, and construction define quality. But this is exactly what made them especially popular in environments where prizes were given out frequently, such as fairs, competitions, and games of chance.

Perhaps most importantly, cigars carried emotional weight. Winning one felt good. Almost winning one felt frustrating. That emotional contrast is critical. Without that sharp difference between success and near-success, the experience wouldn’t have been memorable enough to stick.

Documented Evidence of Cigar Prizes Before the 1920s

While the 1920s carnival environment played a major role in popularizing cigar-based rewards, documented evidence shows that cigars were already being used as prizes decades earlier. One of the most valuable historical references appears in Robert Machray’s 1902 book, The Night Side of London, which provides a vivid, firsthand account of public amusements where cigars functioned as incentives.

Machray describes penny-based games where players were promised a cigar upon reaching a specific score. The passage is especially revealing because it captures the psychological loop created by cigar prizes: players repeatedly tried, narrowly failed, and continued spending money in pursuit of the reward. The cigar was positioned as attainable but elusive, encouraging persistence even when success remained out of reach.

Crucially, this account demonstrates that cigars were already entrenched as motivational rewards before the phrase itself became widespread. The object’s role as a prize, and as a driver of near-miss frustration, was established early. This confirms that cigar-based reward culture was not a sudden 1920s invention, but an evolution of earlier public entertainment practices.

Carnivals, Fairs, and Public Amusements

Traveling carnivals and local fairs were cultural hotspots in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. They brought excitement, novelty, and competition to towns that otherwise ran on routine. Skill games were a major attraction—ring tosses, shooting galleries, strength tests—all designed to look easy and feel achievable.

Cigars were among the most common prizes at these games. They were visible, appealing, and easy to display. A row of cigars behind a counter created instant motivation. Players didn’t need to ask what they’d win; they could see it.

But here’s where things get interesting: these games were designed to produce near misses. Players would come close, so close, but fall just short. That moment, standing there empty-handed while staring at the cigars you almost won, burned itself into memory.

Over time, this repeated experience became shared knowledge. People understood what it meant to be close and still walk away without the cigar. The object itself, the cigar, was central to that understanding.

The 1920s Fairground Context and Verbal Callouts

Fairground operators were not silent observers; they were performers. Barkers actively narrated each attempt, calling out successes, failures, and near-wins to draw crowds and maintain energy. When a player narrowly missed a winning condition: one pin short, one ring slipping off, one target barely grazed, the callout mattered as much as the miss itself.

In this environment, phrases were spoken aloud repeatedly, not whispered or implied. The verbal acknowledgment of a near-win served a functional purpose: it validated the effort while reinforcing the rules. The announcement that a player had come close but failed prevented disputes and kept the game moving. Importantly, it also publicly clarified that the prize, often a cigar, had not been earned. This vocal emphasis on the absence of the cigar reinforced its role as the defining boundary between success and failure.

The phrase emerged not as a clever turn of language but as a spoken transaction marker—a way for operators to close an attempt cleanly. Its repetition across games and locations embedded it in public memory long before it entered print or casual conversation.

Traveling Carnivals and the Geographic Spread of Cigar Culture

Unlike static venues, carnivals moved from town to town, carrying not only games and prizes but also shared habits, phrases, and performance styles. Operators reused the same language night after night, season after season, across state lines.

This mobility meant that the same cigar-centered reward system, and the same verbal reactions to near misses, were experienced by vastly different communities. A phrase heard at a Midwestern fair could later be repeated at an East Coast boardwalk or a Southern county fair. Cigars functioned as a unifying prize across regions, allowing the experience to remain consistent even as locations changed.

Because cigars were widely recognized and culturally legible, no explanation was required. The traveling nature of carnivals helped standardize the experience of “almost winning” a cigar, ensuring that the moment, and the language surrounding it, felt familiar wherever it occurred. This geographic repetition played a crucial role in turning a situational remark into a shared cultural reference.

The Economics of Cigars as Giveaways

From a business perspective, cigars were a smart choice. Bulk production made them relatively inexpensive for operators, especially when sourced from lower-cost manufacturers.  In size and quality, many prize cigars were closer to what we’d now consider cigarillos—small, inexpensive, and designed for quick enjoyment.  At the same time, the public didn’t always distinguish between a premium cigar and a basic one. A cigar was a cigar, and it carried the same symbolic weight regardless of price.

Cigar manufacturers also benefited from this system. Giving away cigars introduced new smokers to specific brands. Even prize cigars often carried labels, subtly reinforcing brand recognition. In this way, cigars functioned as both reward and advertisement.

The low cost of cigars made it easier to create scenarios where players almost won. The prize didn’t have to be rare—it just had to feel earned. And when someone failed to win it, the disappointment was real, even if the material loss was minimal.

Cigar Quality and the Meaning of “Winning”

Not all cigars were created equal, and prize cigars were often on the lower end of the quality spectrum.  Unlike premium cigars today, which are carefully aged and preserved in a humidor to maintain flavor and structure, prize cigars were meant to be smoked quickly, not saved.  For many winners, especially infrequent smokers, the appeal wasn’t flavor but the buzz that came with lighting up a freshly earned cigar. But most of that didn’t matter. What mattered was the act of winning, not the smoking experience itself.   

The cigar symbolized success in a public, visible way. Holding it, even before lighting it, was a badge of honor. It told others you’d done something right, something skillful. That symbolism didn’t require a premium blend or expert construction.

Missing out on that symbol, especially when you came close, hit harder than missing out on something purely functional. You weren’t just losing a cigar. You were losing recognition.

Near Misses and Human Psychology

Human beings are wired to react strongly to near misses. Studies have shown that almost winning can feel more intense than clearly losing. When cigars were on the line, this effect was amplified.  Games such as ring tosses, bottle throws, shooting galleries, and similar skill challenges were intentionally structured to keep success just out of reach. Players might land several rings correctly or hit most targets, yet fall short of the winning condition by a narrow margin.

This design made cigars particularly effective as prizes. Because the reward was visible and clearly defined, the player could measure exactly how close they came. The closer the miss, the stronger the emotional response. The operator’s verbal acknowledgment reinforced this design, confirming both effort and failure in a single moment.

The cigar was essential to this system because it represented a clean, binary outcome: either you held it, or you didn’t. There was no partial reward. That clarity made cigars ideal anchors for near-miss experiences and helped cement their symbolic power.

Seeing the prize, imagining holding it, and then falling just short created a powerful emotional response. That response stuck. People talked about it. They joked about it. They remembered it.

Cigars became shorthand for that experience. You didn’t need to explain the entire situation. Mentioning the cigar was enough to bring the memory flooding back.

Cigars and Masculine Identity

In the social world where cigars functioned as prizes, masculinity was not an abstract concept: it was something performed, observed, and judged in public spaces. Cigars fit neatly into this framework because they carried visual and behavioral signals that aligned with prevailing ideas of what it meant to be competent, confident, and in control.

A man smoking a cigar was not rushing. He was unhurried, composed, and self-assured. The cigar required patience to light, time to smoke, and a certain physical ease to hold properly.  Even knowing how to light and smoke a cigar properly was part of the social performance. These qualities mirrored the traits admired in men at the time: steadiness, restraint, and confidence.

Winning a cigar in a competitive setting amplified those traits. It wasn’t merely about possession; it was about demonstration. Successfully earning a cigar in front of others showed that a man had the coordination, skill, or luck required to prevail. The reward was visible and performative. Lighting the cigar afterward extended the victory, allowing the winner to occupy space with confidence while others watched. Masculinity, in this context, was affirmed not through aggression but through mastery and calm display.

Failing to win a cigar, particularly by a narrow margin, did not negate masculinity, which is precisely why the experience was so powerful. Instead, it emphasized how precarious success could be. 

The cigar, then, operated as more than a reward. It was a social measuring stick. Holding it signaled competence; missing out on it signaled proximity to competence. In both cases, masculinity was negotiated through the object itself.

Cigars in Early Advertising and Promotions

Early advertising understood something fundamental about cigars: they were already loaded with meaning before any slogan was written. Advertisers leaned heavily into this existing symbolism, portraying cigars not merely as products but as visual shorthand for success, relaxation, and earned pleasure. Posters, handbills, and storefront displays frequently featured men who appeared self-possessed and satisfied, a cigar either in hand or between their fingers. These images did not need explanation. The cigar did the communicative work on its own.

This strategy was especially effective because it operated on repetition. Each attempt at winning a cigar strengthened the association between cigars and achievement. Over time, cigars became mentally linked with the idea of deserved enjoyment. Advertising didn’t have to persuade people that cigars were rewarding; it simply positioned them where rewards already existed. The cigar became both the message and the medium.

Cigars in Social Spaces

Outside of formal amusements, cigars played similar roles in everyday social environments.  Cigars were lit at the table, rested in shared ashtrays, and relit casually with whatever lighter or match was at hand.  Bars, clubs, fraternal lodges, and back rooms hosted countless informal competitions where cigars served as stakes. Card games, shooting matches, darts, and friendly wagers often revolved around cigars because they were socially acceptable, immediately usable, and symbolically potent.  

In these spaces, the act of winning a cigar was inseparable from the act of smoking it. Victory was not complete until the cigar was lit. This created a powerful visual dynamic. The winner enjoyed the physical pleasure of smoking while the loser, or near-winner, was forced to witness it. The smoke itself became part of the experience, drifting through the room as a reminder of who had succeeded.

Near losses were particularly impactful. Watching someone else enjoy a cigar you almost won sharpened the emotional edge of the moment. The cigar was no longer an abstract prize; it was a sensory presence. The smell, the glow, the casual gestures of the smoker all reinforced the cigar’s role as a marker of success. Social spaces turned cigars into shared reference points, making them ideal candidates for broader cultural meaning.

From Physical Prize to Cultural Reference

When an experience repeats frequently across different settings and social groups, it begins to shed its specifics and become symbolic. Cigars were present in countless moments of near victory; at fairs, in bars, at games, and during friendly competitions. Over time, people no longer needed to recount the entire scenario. The cigar alone could stand in for the experience.

This shift from object to reference did not happen instantly. It was built through repetition and shared understanding. Everyone knew what it felt like to reach for the prize and fall short. Everyone knew what it meant to watch someone else light up while you walked away empty-handed. The cigar became a condensed symbol of that feeling.

Once that shared understanding existed, the cigar no longer needed to be physically present. Mentioning it was enough to evoke the entire emotional landscape: effort, anticipation, disappointment, and resignation. The object had become cultural shorthand, carrying meaning far beyond its material form.

Early Print Usage Beyond Fairgrounds

The earliest known appearance of the phrase in print that is not directly tied to a carnival setting occurred in 1929, when it appeared as a paragraph heading in the Long Island Daily Press. In this instance, the phrase was used metaphorically to describe a man who narrowly failed to win the presidency of a community association.

This moment marks a significant transition. The cigar had already done enough cultural work that it could be removed from its original physical setting and still be immediately understood by readers. No explanation was necessary. The audience already knew what the cigar represented: a reward withheld despite proximity to success.

This print usage shows the cigar had fully crossed from object to reference. The prize itself was no longer required; only the idea of it. That shift is essential in understanding how cigar-centered experiences translated into lasting cultural language.

The Role of Film and Mass Media in Reinforcing the Cigar Reference

By the 1930s, the phrase had migrated into movies, further separating it from its original prize context while amplifying its reach. A well-known example appears in the film Annie Oakley, where the line “Close, Colonel, but no cigar!” is delivered in dialogue.

Film usage mattered because it introduced the cigar reference to audiences who may never have encountered cigar prizes firsthand. The phrase no longer required lived experience at a carnival or game booth. Instead, it relied on shared cultural recognition built through repetition in media.

This transition into scripted entertainment demonstrates the final stage of the cigar’s evolution: from prize, to spoken remark, to mass-cultural reference. By the time it reached film, the cigar had become a fully portable symbol of near-success.

Why Cigars Endured While Other Prizes Didn’t

Many prizes circulated through public life: coins, food, small tools, novelty items, but few endured as symbols. Cigars survived because they engaged multiple senses and operated on multiple levels.  Their portability helped cigars outlast other prizes, a quality that modern smokers preserve through tools like travel humidors. They were seen, smelled, touched, and tasted. They were consumed slowly, extending the experience of winning beyond the moment itself.  

Cigars also occupied a unique cultural position. They were indulgent without being frivolous, accessible without being mundane. Unlike cash, which disappears into general use, a cigar demanded attention. Unlike food, it wasn’t necessary. Unlike tokens, it wasn’t meaningless. It sat in a perfect middle ground that allowed it to carry symbolic weight.

Because cigars were experiences rather than mere objects, they lingered in memory. Winning one felt different from winning something utilitarian. Losing one felt sharper. That emotional resonance is why cigars endured while other prizes faded into obscurity.

The Shift Away From Cigars as Prizes

While cigars dominated prize culture during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, they eventually began to disappear from carnival booths. Changing public attitudes toward smoking, increasing family-oriented attendance, and evolving ideas about appropriate prizes all contributed to this shift. By the mid-20th century, cigars were increasingly replaced by stuffed animals, novelty items, and toys designed to appeal to younger audiences.

What’s notable is that the phrase persisted even after the object vanished. This disconnect highlights how deeply cigars had embedded themselves into the cultural memory of winning and near-winning. The physical prize was no longer present, but the symbolic role it played remained intact. The cigar had already completed its transition from material object to conceptual marker.

This replacement underscores the durability of cigar symbolism. Other prizes faded without leaving linguistic traces, but cigars had already done the cultural work necessary to endure beyond their physical use.

Cigars and the Language of Success

Language often emerges from physical experience. Before success and failure became abstract concepts, they were felt through objects. Cigars shaped how people talked about achievement because they physically embodied it. Holding a cigar meant you had crossed a threshold. Missing out meant you hadn’t.  Even today, the rituals surrounding cigars, from learning how to cut it to lighting it, carry echoes of earned indulgence.

This object-based understanding of success made cigars ideal linguistic anchors. They allowed people to describe outcomes without lengthy explanation. The cigar encapsulated effort, expectation, and outcome in a single image. It wasn’t necessary to explain what went wrong or how close someone came. The absence of the cigar said enough.

In this way, cigars helped bridge the gap between lived experience and expression. They provided a concrete reference point that language could build upon.

Why Other Cigar-Linked Expressions Took Different Paths

Cigars have inspired numerous expressions, but not all followed the same trajectory. Some sayings emerged from literary, political, or psychological contexts rather than public competition. These expressions tended to remain tied to their original speakers or texts, limiting their adaptability.

What distinguishes the cigar’s role in competitive settings is participation. Carnival phrases were experienced collectively, not consumed passively. People didn’t just hear about cigars as symbols; they chased them, missed them, watched others enjoy them. That experiential foundation allowed certain cigar-related references to become durable cultural shorthand, while others remained contextual or anecdotal.

This distinction explains why some cigar-associated language endured broadly while other expressions remained niche or interpretive. The cigar that could be won, or almost won, proved far more influential than the cigar merely observed or discussed.

Why the Cigar Remained Even After Cultural Relevance Declined

Today, cigars are rarely viewed as rewards, and they are no longer appropriate for many public venues. Yet the cigar remains embedded in the expression, even as its literal role has faded.

This endurance reinforces a key idea: once an object becomes linguistically symbolic, it no longer needs to reflect current habits. Replacing the cigar with a modern prize would feel wrong because the phrase is anchored to a specific historical experience, not a flexible reward category.

The cigar survived because it was never just about smoking. It represented adult leisure, earned indulgence, and visible success—qualities that remain legible even when the object itself becomes less common.

Modern Reflections on Cigar-Based Rewards

Today, cigars no longer occupy the same central role in public prize culture, but their symbolic legacy remains intact. Cigars are still associated with celebration, milestones, and earned pleasure. They appear at weddings, business deals, and personal achievements, not because they are necessary, but because they signal that something meaningful has occurred.  In modern settings, that meaning is often reinforced through ritual—selecting a cigar, using proper cigar cutters, and pausing to mark the moment before lighting up.

Modern audiences may not encounter cigars as carnival prizes, but the cultural memory persists. The idea of the cigar as a reward remains instantly recognizable, even to those who don’t smoke. That recognition speaks to the depth of the cigar’s historical role.  What was once a spontaneous reward has evolved into a more intentional experience, supported by specialized cigar accessories and humidors that frame smoking as a deliberate act rather than a casual habit.

The object has outlived its original context, carrying forward the meaning built through generations of competition and near-misses.  

When the Prize Became the Point

The phrase could not exist without the cigar because the cigar was never incidental. It was the object that transformed moments of effort into moments of meaning. As a prize, it created clear distinctions between success and near success. As a symbol, it condensed those experiences into something shareable and enduring.

If you're looking to take better care of your cigars as well as elevate your smoking experience, feel free to check out our excellent collections of cigar humidor cabinets, humidor humidifiers, air purifiers for smoke, and essential cigar accessories.

Cigars were not just rewards handed out at games or competitions. They were cultural anchors, objects through which people learned how to recognize achievement, cope with disappointment, and communicate the space between the two. That legacy is why the cigar remains central to the story, long after the smoke has cleared.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Why were cigars used as prizes instead of money or other items?

Cigars offered a balance of affordability, desirability, and symbolic value. They felt like a luxury without being impractical, making them ideal rewards for public competitions and games.

2. Were cigar prizes meant to be smoked or just symbolic rewards?

They were meant to be smoked, but their symbolic value often mattered more than the act itself. Simply holding and lighting a cigar publicly signaled success and recognition.

3. Did carnival operators intentionally design games to be hard to win cigars?

Yes, many games were structured to create near misses rather than frequent wins. This design kept players engaged while reinforcing the cigar as a clearly defined marker of success.

4. How did cigars move from physical prizes to cultural references?

Repeated public experiences of winning, or narrowly missing, cigars created shared understanding. Over time, the cigar became shorthand for near-success, even when no prize was involved.

5. Why hasn’t the cigar been replaced by a modern equivalent in the phrase?

The cigar is tied to a specific historical experience that can’t be swapped out. Once it became symbolic, changing the object would break the cultural memory the phrase depends on.